Jah-Jah Is Likely Vexed With Our Worship of SIM
- aquest
- 9 minutes ago
- 5 min read
In our Caribbean context, the humble SIM-card has become a symbol — not only of connectivity, but of obsession. In Jamaica and across CARICOM nations, mobile phones are everywhere. They promise connection, opportunity and empowerment. Yet increasingly we must ask: what if our devotion to these devices is costing us more than we gain? What if the Almighty is watching, wondering at our worship of the SIM?
I. The Rise of the Mobile Phone in Jamaica
In Jamaica, mobile telephony penetrated deeply and quickly. One ethnographic study noted that by 2004, there were about 2 million mobile subscribers in Jamaica in a population of approximately 2.6 million — roughly three phones per household in some areas. (University College London)More recently, by early 2023, Jamaica had about 3.20 million cellular mobile connections — equivalent to approximately 113.1 % of the total population. (DataReportal – Global Digital Insights)Usage spans nearly all classes, ages and locations. One study found that “mobile phone usage has achieved 94 % and 96 % prevalence” among certain Jamaican populations. (uwispace.sta.uwi.edu)
So we are dealing not with a niche tool, but with a near-universal device in our society.

II. The Blessing and the Burden
The mobile phone has undeniable benefits. It allows migrants to stay connected with family, it offers rapid communication in emergencies, it can enable business and informal economy activities. For low-income Jamaicans, one ethnography described mobile phones as becoming “central to the survival strategies of the lowest income population”. (University College London)But these opportunities come with costs, subtle and overt. A major consideration: how the device begins to dominate time, attention, relationships and values.
1. Time and attention
In the Jamaican context, one study of young adults found that mobile social networking (via smartphone) was “widely practiced among emerging adults” and often exceeded two hours daily. (ResearchGate)That means hours of potential use for productivity, study, reflection, or face-to-face relationships may instead be consumed by scrolling, messaging, reacting.
2. Relationships and community
The mobile device changes how we relate. The ethnography in Jamaica described how communication via phone became an end-in-itself — the “link-up” function — rather than simply a tool for connection or purpose. (University College London)In other words: the device itself becomes ritualised—how many of our children and youth see their phone not simply as a tool, but as an extension of self-identity.
3. Risk, distraction and mental health
Recent research in the Caribbean shows troubling associations. A study of adolescents in The Bahamas (a CARICOM neighbour) found that about two-thirds spent 3+ hours a day on social media; cyber-bullying, sexting and other online risk behaviours were common; and depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation were far higher than global averages. (BioMed Central)While Jamaica-specific data on all of these risk behaviours is still emerging, the groundwork is there: youth with ready smartphone access and social-networking use are at increased risk of distraction, poor sleep, virtual/real identity conflicts and diminished face-to-face engagement.
4. Economic and social opportunity vs. consumption
While mobile phones might deliver opportunity, one Jamaican study found that the optimism about mobile phones leading to income generation was not borne out in the low-income areas studied: many phones were used for social linkage rather than for job / entrepreneurial leverage. (University College London)Thus the device can become more of a consumption ritual than a tool for transformation — the “worship of SIM” indeed.

III. Theological & Sociocultural Reflection
From a faith perspective, what does it mean when a device (or multiple devices) begins to claim our devotion? If we imagine Jah as the ultimate communicator, the divine presence, then our constant tethering to phones, our craving for connectivity, applause, likes, messages could be seen as a form of idolatry — exchanging the worship of the One for the worship of the machine.
In Jamaican culture, the phone is no longer simply a tool of convenience: it is part of the daily ritual, the social status totem, the anxiety-soother. When youth ask, “Are you on WhatsApp / Facebook / Instagram?”, often the answer is expected: yes. The phone is assumed.The metaphor of worship is apt: we invest attention, emotion, time, status in the SIM and device. We sacrifice other things — quietude, reflection, community gathering, mentorship, spirituality.Thus the provocative notion: Jah-Jah (God) may indeed be vexed, watching how we bend before our screens, distracted from His voice.
IV. Socially Undesirable Outcomes
Linking the above to socially undesirable outcomes in Jamaica / CARICOM:
Erosion of in-person community: When young people are engaged with phones rather than neighbours, elders, mentors, the social fabric weakens.
Decline in attention and schooling: Substantial phone/social-network use correlates with poor sleep, distraction from study or work. The Jamaican young adult study flagged issues of low academic or work performance associated with high mobile social networking times. (ResearchGate)
Mental-health risks: As noted, the Caribbean study showed high rates of depression and suicidal ideation in youth who engage heavily online. (BioMed Central) While this was The Bahamas, the pattern likely applies regionally.
Status problems and consumption pressures: Having the latest phone, frequent airtime top-ups, staying “online” becomes a form of status — which for low-income many may create stress. The ethnography noted that poor households still prioritised mobile-phone usage. (University College London)
Misdirected resources: Time and money spent on phones and airtime may crowd out other investments: skill development, relational capital, spiritual life.
Attention economy and misinformation: The mobile phone brings social media, which may magnify gossip, image-pressure, envy, mis-information, and distract from community-building. While Caribbean-specific research is still limited, global trends suggest that heavy social-media use increases risk behaviours. (BioMed Central)
V. Call to Action: Towards Balanced Use and Rediscovered Worship
If indeed “worship of SIM” is distracting us, then what can be done?
Awareness: We must name the problem. Recognise that the device is not value-neutral; its usage has social, psychological, spiritual consequences.
Intentionality: Set limits. For example, device-free times (family meals, church, community gatherings). Encourage youth to reflect on how much phone time they have and what they are gaining (or losing).
Technology as servant, not master: Re-frame the phone as tool for connection, learning, upliftment—not the centre of identity or status.
Strengthen face-to-face community: Re-invest in relational spaces where phones are put aside: church groups, neighbourhood mentoring, elder-youth dialogues.
Spiritual re-alignment: Teach that worship belongs to Jah, not to a gadget. Our gratitude, reflection, rest, listening to the Divine involves unplugging, quiet stillness.
Policy and education: Incorporate mobile-use literacy, digital-wellness education in schools; research regionally more about the specific Caribbean patterns of phone-use harm.
Alternative narratives: Highlight stories of youth or communities who reclaim time, choose “offline” days, or use phones primarily for productive ends.\
VI. Conclusion
In the Caribbean, the mobile phone is a marvel—an enabler of connection, a bridge across diaspora, a tool of modernity. But like every powerful tool, it demands discipline, boundaries and wisdom.Our “worship of SIM” — the devotion to being always connected, always online, always reachable — may be robbing us of something deeper: silence, reflection, community, worship of the One who made us. If Jah is indeed watching, it may be not our airtime we should fear, but where our hearts belong.Let us reclaim our devices — as servants — and reclaim ourselves and our communities — as stewards of meaningful living, not mere connectivity.
Comments